linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-nb-wmi: Do not load on Asus T100TA and T200TA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 23:56:42 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
        acpi4asus-user <acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-nb-wmi: Do not load on Asus T100TA and T200TA

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 10:54 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 4/23/20 12:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Andy, Darren, I see that you have already added this to the for-next
> branch of linux-platform-drivers-x86. I'm not sure what your vision
> on forced pushed there is. If forced pushes are ok, please drop this
> patch. If not let me know and I will send out a revert.

Forced pushes are not okay, but we have exceptions in some cases.
It would be done here, but there are complications, i.e. we have
already immutable branch merged from MFD. Of course, I would remerge
it again, but I think we better not to do this right now, so, revert
seems a less painful in this case. Or, if you have already done
something better, than keep it as follow up improvement rather than
pure revert.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko