linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-nb-wmi: Do not load on Asus T100TA and T200TA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdTuwyJuGsAR4NwJm302Va+68dDdtC-kn3581asg-onvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 9 May 2020 15:23:16 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
        acpi4asus-user <acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-nb-wmi: Do not load on Asus T100TA and T200TA

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 11:56 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 10:54 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On 4/23/20 12:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> > Andy, Darren, I see that you have already added this to the for-next
> > branch of linux-platform-drivers-x86. I'm not sure what your vision
> > on forced pushed there is. If forced pushes are ok, please drop this
> > patch. If not let me know and I will send out a revert.
>
> Forced pushes are not okay, but we have exceptions in some cases.
> It would be done here, but there are complications, i.e. we have
> already immutable branch merged from MFD. Of course, I would remerge
> it again, but I think we better not to do this right now, so, revert
> seems a less painful in this case. Or, if you have already done
> something better, than keep it as follow up improvement rather than
> pure revert.

Oops, it seems I was quick enough to push this to v5.7-rc4. So, please
send revert!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko