lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 09:52:10 +0200
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Bernard <bernard@...o.com>
Cc:     Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
        Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: remove no need devm_kfree in probe [re-send,
 welcome any comments]

Hi Bernard.

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:49:03PM +0800, Bernard wrote:
> Remove no need devm_kfree in probe.
> The change is to make the code a bit more readable
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>

Could you take a closer look and fix similar patterns
in the rest of the driver?
For example in exynos_dpi_probe()

Is would be nice to only have to review for this
type of changes once, so one patch-set is preferred
over single patches over time.

You can add:
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>

to this patch when you re-send a new series.

Thanks,
	Sam

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c | 10 +++-------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c
> index 43fa0f26c052..e06f7d7a6695 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c
> @@ -181,10 +181,8 @@ static int exynos_dpi_parse_dt(struct exynos_dpi *ctx)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  		ret = of_get_videomode(dn, vm, 0);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			devm_kfree(dev, vm);
> +		if (ret < 0)
>  			return ret;
> -		}
>  
>  		ctx->vm = vm;
>  
> @@ -233,10 +231,8 @@ struct drm_encoder *exynos_dpi_probe(struct device *dev)
>  	ctx->dev = dev;
>  
>  	ret = exynos_dpi_parse_dt(ctx);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		devm_kfree(dev, ctx);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  
>  	if (ctx->panel_node) {
>  		ctx->panel = of_drm_find_panel(ctx->panel_node);
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
> 
> [re-send, welcome any comments]
> Regards,
> Bernard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ