linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Return true,false in voluntary_active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 11:06:17 +0200
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Return true,false in
 voluntary_active_balance()

On 08/05/2020 10.16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:06:25PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
>> Fix the following coccicheck warning:
>>
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:9375:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function
>> 'voluntary_active_balance' with return type bool
> 
> That's not a warning, that's a broken cocinelle script, which if these
> stupid patches don't stop, I'm going to delete myself!


I was wondering why I got cc'ed here. Then it dawned on me. What can I
say, I was young.

Ack on nuking it.

Rasmus