lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 13:16:04 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     jeyu@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, aquini@...hat.com,
        cai@....pw, dyoung@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, gpiccoli@...onical.com,
        pmladek@...e.com, tiwai@...e.de, schlad@...e.de,
        keescook@...omium.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, will@...nel.org,
        mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] taint: add module firmware crash taint support

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:14:38AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Device driver firmware can crash, and sometimes, this can leave your
> system in a state which makes the device or subsystem completely
> useless. Detecting this by inspecting /proc/sys/kernel/tainted instead
> of scraping some magical words from the kernel log, which is driver
> specific, is much easier. So instead provide a helper which lets drivers
> annotate this.
> 
> Once this happens, scrapers can easily scrape modules taint flags.
> This will taint both the kernel and respective calling module.
> 
> The new helper module_firmware_crashed() uses LOCKDEP_STILL_OK as
> this fact should in no way shape or form affect lockdep. This taint
> is device driver specific.

...

> +++ b/include/trace/events/module.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ struct module;
>  	{ (1UL << TAINT_OOT_MODULE),		"O" },		\
>  	{ (1UL << TAINT_FORCED_MODULE),		"F" },		\
>  	{ (1UL << TAINT_CRAP),			"C" },		\
> -	{ (1UL << TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE),	"E" })
> +	{ (1UL << TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE),	"E" },		\
> +	{ (1UL << TAINT_FIRMWARE_CRASH),	"Q" })

Perhaps split out the closing parenthesis to avoid changing additional line in
the future?

>  TRACE_EVENT(module_load,

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ