[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200508094923.2ab9014a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 09:49:45 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, jeyu@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de, mingo@...hat.com,
aquini@...hat.com, cai@....pw, dyoung@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, gpiccoli@...onical.com,
pmladek@...e.com, tiwai@...e.de, schlad@...e.de,
keescook@...omium.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, will@...nel.org,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] taint: add module firmware crash taint support
On Fri, 8 May 2020 13:16:04 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/module.h
> > @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ struct module;
> > { (1UL << TAINT_OOT_MODULE), "O" }, \
> > { (1UL << TAINT_FORCED_MODULE), "F" }, \
> > { (1UL << TAINT_CRAP), "C" }, \
> > - { (1UL << TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE), "E" })
> > + { (1UL << TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE), "E" }, \
> > + { (1UL << TAINT_FIRMWARE_CRASH), "Q" })
>
> Perhaps split out the closing parenthesis to avoid changing additional line in
> the future?
I don't think that will make a difference, as the last line must not
contain a comma. New updates will still add additional line changes just to
insert a comma before adding a new flag.
-- Steve
>
> > TRACE_EVENT(module_load,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists