lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200508202217.4e5b9442@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 20:22:17 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the hmm tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile

between commit:

  b0d449922eb8 ("mm/hmm/test: add selftests for HMM")

from the hmm tree and commit:

  3a07caa68f66 ("selftests: vm: pkeys: fix multilib builds for x86")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile
index c6eb5305a0f6,d7eae41be628..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile
@@@ -34,8 -58,55 +59,57 @@@ TEST_FILES := test_vmalloc.s
  KSFT_KHDR_INSTALL := 1
  include ../lib.mk
  
+ ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
+ BINARIES_32 := $(patsubst %,$(OUTPUT)/%,$(BINARIES_32))
+ BINARIES_64 := $(patsubst %,$(OUTPUT)/%,$(BINARIES_64))
+ 
+ define gen-target-rule-32
+ $(1) $(1)_32: $(OUTPUT)/$(1)_32
+ .PHONY: $(1) $(1)_32
+ endef
+ 
+ define gen-target-rule-64
+ $(1) $(1)_64: $(OUTPUT)/$(1)_64
+ .PHONY: $(1) $(1)_64
+ endef
+ 
+ ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_I386),1)
+ $(BINARIES_32): CFLAGS += -m32
+ $(BINARIES_32): LDLIBS += -lrt -ldl -lm
+ $(BINARIES_32): %_32: %.c
+ 	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(notdir $^) $(LDLIBS) -o $@
+ $(foreach t,$(TARGETS),$(eval $(call gen-target-rule-32,$(t))))
+ endif
+ 
+ ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_X86_64),1)
+ $(BINARIES_64): CFLAGS += -m64
+ $(BINARIES_64): LDLIBS += -lrt -ldl
+ $(BINARIES_64): %_64: %.c
+ 	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(notdir $^) $(LDLIBS) -o $@
+ $(foreach t,$(TARGETS),$(eval $(call gen-target-rule-64,$(t))))
+ endif
+ 
+ # x86_64 users should be encouraged to install 32-bit libraries
+ ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_I386)$(CAN_BUILD_X86_64),01)
+ all: warn_32bit_failure
+ 
+ warn_32bit_failure:
+ 	@echo "Warning: you seem to have a broken 32-bit build" 2>&1;		\
+ 	echo  "environment. This will reduce test coverage of 64-bit" 2>&1;	\
+ 	echo  "kernels. If you are using a Debian-like distribution," 2>&1;	\
+ 	echo  "try:"; 2>&1;							\
+ 	echo  "";								\
+ 	echo  "  apt-get install gcc-multilib libc6-i386 libc6-dev-i386";	\
+ 	echo  "";								\
+ 	echo  "If you are using a Fedora-like distribution, try:";		\
+ 	echo  "";								\
+ 	echo  "  yum install glibc-devel.*i686";				\
+ 	exit 0;
+ endif
+ endif
+ 
 +$(OUTPUT)/hmm-tests: LDLIBS += -lhugetlbfs -lpthread
 +
  $(OUTPUT)/userfaultfd: LDLIBS += -lpthread
  
  $(OUTPUT)/mlock-random-test: LDLIBS += -lcap

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ