[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e8e9e2e-e7a0-a9f7-79d7-1b48d5f7a6ae@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 18:32:19 +0800
From: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: <mhiramat@...nel.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Shiyuan Hu <hushiyuan@...wei.com>,
Hewenliang <hewenliang4@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/bootconfig: fix resource leak in apply_xbc()
On 2020/5/8 17:30, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:51:15PM +0800, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/bootconfig/main.c b/tools/bootconfig/main.c
>> index 16b9a420e6fd..d034f86022b7 100644
>> --- a/tools/bootconfig/main.c
>> +++ b/tools/bootconfig/main.c
>> @@ -314,31 +314,33 @@ int apply_xbc(const char *path, const char *xbc_path)
>> ret = delete_xbc(path);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> pr_err("Failed to delete previous boot config: %d\n", ret);
>> - return ret;
>> + goto free_data;
>> }
>>
>> /* Apply new one */
>> fd = open(path, O_RDWR | O_APPEND);
>> if (fd < 0) {
>> pr_err("Failed to open %s: %d\n", path, fd);
>> - return fd;
>> + ret = fd;
>> + goto free_data;
>> }
>> /* TODO: Ensure the @path is initramfs/initrd image */
>> ret = write(fd, data, size + 8);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> pr_err("Failed to apply a boot config: %d\n", ret);
>> - return ret;
>> + goto close_fd;
>> }
>> /* Write a magic word of the bootconfig */
>> ret = write(fd, BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC, BOOTCONFIG_MAGIC_LEN);
>
> write returns the number of bytes written on success
>
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> pr_err("Failed to apply a boot config magic: %d\n", ret);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> +
>> +close_fd:
>> close(fd);
>> +free_data:
>> free(data);
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + return ret;
>
> But we want to return zero on success.
>
yes, I should set 'ret' to 0 before returning on success. thanks.
>> }
>
> Btw, these leaks are totally harmless. This is a short running user
> space program with is going to immediately exit on error so the memory
> will be freed anyway. But the benifit is to silence static checker
> warnings so that's useful.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists