[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj-Znzqp3xktZ+kERM5cKF-Yh_6XjyGYof6bqPq2T3F5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 13:07:48 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] exec: Directly call security_bprm_set_creds from __do_execve_file
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 12:44 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Now that security_bprm_set_creds is no longer responsible for calling
> cap_bprm_set_creds, security_bprm_set_creds only does something for
> the primary file that is being executed (not any interpreters it may
> have). Therefore call security_bprm_set_creds from __do_execve_file,
> instead of from prepare_binprm so that it is only called once, and
> remove the now unnecessary called_set_creds field of struct binprm.
Ahh, good, this patch removes the 'called_set_creds' logic from the
security subsystems.
So it does half of what I asked for: please also just rename that
"security_bprm_set_creds()" to be "security_primary_bprm_set_creds()"
so that the change of semantics also shows up that way.
And so that there is no confusion about the fact that
"cap_bprm_set_creds()" has absolutely nothing to do with
"security_bprm_set_creds()" any more.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists