[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acab7971-7522-3511-c976-e0237ceda4d0@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 21:10:25 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
dyoung@...hat.com, corbet@....net, mcgrof@...nel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cai@....pw,
tytso@....edu, bunk@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, labbott@...hat.com, jeffm@...e.com,
jikos@...nel.org, jeyu@...e.de, tiwai@...e.de, AnDavis@...e.com,
rpalethorpe@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel: add panic_on_taint
On 5/9/20 7:59 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> Read admin-guide/tainted-kernels.rst, but still do not get what 'G' means.
I interpret 'G' as GPL (strictly it means that no proprietary module has
been loaded). But I don't see why TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE is the only
taint flag that has a non-blank c_false character. It could just be blank
also AFAICT. Then the 'G' would not be there to confuse us. :)
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists