lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 10 May 2020 13:16:46 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <>
To:     Randy Dunlap <>
Cc:     Rafael Aquini <>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel: add panic_on_taint

On 05/09/20 at 09:10pm, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 5/9/20 7:59 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Read admin-guide/tainted-kernels.rst, but still do not get what 'G' means.
> I interpret 'G' as GPL (strictly it means that no proprietary module has
> been loaded).  But I don't see why TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE is the only
> taint flag that has a non-blank c_false character.  It could just be blank
> also AFAICT.  Then the 'G' would not be there to confuse us.  :)

Yeah, seems c_false character is not so necessary. If no 'P' set, then
it means no proprietary modules loaded naturally. We may need clean up
the c_false in struct taint_flag, since c_true is enough to indicate
what want to check.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists