[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5635dbb-5bd6-ca01-ca3b-4932941fd19a@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 09:30:36 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<alankao@...estech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] riscv: perf_event: Make some funciton static
On 2020/5/9 1:13, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> What's the "-next" for? This seems appropriate for an RC to me, as
> it's a
> build fix.
Thanks for your review, this patch and "[PATCH -next] riscv: perf:
RISCV_BASE_PMU
should be closeable", I fix the issue based on linux-next, so add the
next prefix ; )
and we also found some another build issue when add RISCV arch to huawei
build robot,
will send out the patches later.
>
> On Thu, 07 May 2020 08:04:44 PDT (-0700), wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com
> wrote:
>> Fixes the following warning detected when running make with W=1,
>> ../arch/riscv/kernel/perf_event.c:150:5: warning: no previous
>> prototype for ‘riscv_map_cache_decode’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> int riscv_map_cache_decode(u64 config, unsigned int *type,
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ../arch/riscv/kernel/perf_event.c:345:13: warning: no previous
>> prototype for ‘riscv_base_pmu_handle_irq’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> irqreturn_t riscv_base_pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ../arch/riscv/kernel/perf_event.c:364:6: warning: no previous
>> prototype for ‘release_pmc_hardware’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> void release_pmc_hardware(void)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ../arch/riscv/kernel/perf_event.c:467:12: warning: no previous
>> prototype for ‘init_hw_perf_events’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Cc: Alan Kao <alankao@...estech.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/kernel/perf_event.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_event.c
>> b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_event.c
>> index 91626d9ae5f2..c835f0362d94 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_event.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_event.c
>> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int riscv_map_hw_event(u64 config)
>> return riscv_pmu->hw_events[config];
>> }
>>
>> -int riscv_map_cache_decode(u64 config, unsigned int *type,
>> +static int riscv_map_cache_decode(u64 config, unsigned int *type,
>> unsigned int *op, unsigned int *result)
>> {
>> return -ENOENT;
>> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void riscv_pmu_del(struct perf_event
>> *event, int flags)
>>
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(pmc_reserve_mutex);
>>
>> -irqreturn_t riscv_base_pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
>> +static irqreturn_t riscv_base_pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
>> {
>> return IRQ_NONE;
>> }
>> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int reserve_pmc_hardware(void)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> -void release_pmc_hardware(void)
>> +static void release_pmc_hardware(void)
>> {
>> mutex_lock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
>> if (riscv_pmu->irq >= 0)
>> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>> riscv_pmu_of_ids[] = {
>> { /* sentinel value */ }
>> };
>>
>> -int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>> +static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>> {
>> struct device_node *node = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, "pmu");
>> const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists