[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200511183401.2ef8b037@xps13>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 18:34:01 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
Cc: computersforpeace@...il.com, kdasu.kdev@...il.com, richard@....at,
vigneshr@...com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nand: brcmnand: improve hamming oob layout
Hi Álvaro,
Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com> wrote on Mon, 4 May 2020
20:59:44 +0200:
> The current code generates 8 oob sections:
> S1 1-5
> ECC 6-8
> S2 9-15
> S3 16-21
> ECC 22-24
> S4 25-31
> S5 32-37
> ECC 38-40
> S6 41-47
> S7 48-53
> ECC 54-56
> S8 57-63
>
> Change it by merging continuous sections:
> S1 1-5
> ECC 6-8
> S2 9-21
> ECC 22-24
> S3 25-37
> ECC 38-40
> S4 41-53
> ECC 54-56
> S5 57-63
>
> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
> ---
> v2: keep original comment and fix correctly skip byte 6 for small-page nand
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 34 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> index e4e3ceeac38f..767343e0e6e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> @@ -1100,30 +1100,32 @@ static int brcmnand_hamming_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> struct brcmnand_cfg *cfg = &host->hwcfg;
> int sas = cfg->spare_area_size << cfg->sector_size_1k;
> int sectors = cfg->page_size / (512 << cfg->sector_size_1k);
> + u32 next;
>
> - if (section >= sectors * 2)
> + if (section > sectors)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> - oobregion->offset = (section / 2) * sas;
> + next = (section * sas);
> + if (section < sectors)
> + next += 6;
>
> - if (section & 1) {
> - oobregion->offset += 9;
> - oobregion->length = 7;
> + if (section) {
> + oobregion->offset = ((section - 1) * sas) + 9;
> } else {
> - oobregion->length = 6;
> -
> - /* First sector of each page may have BBI */
> - if (!section) {
> - /*
> - * Small-page NAND use byte 6 for BBI while large-page
> - * NAND use byte 0.
> - */
> - if (cfg->page_size > 512)
> - oobregion->offset++;
> - oobregion->length--;
> + /*
> + * Small-page NAND use byte 6 for BBI while large-page
> + * NAND use byte 0.
> + */
> + if (cfg->page_size > 512) {
> + oobregion->offset = 1;
> + } else {
> + oobregion->offset = 0;
> + next--;
> }
> }
>
> + oobregion->length = next - oobregion->offset;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
I'm fine with the two patches but could you please invert the order and
add Fixes: + Cc: stable tags on both? on "fix hamming oob layout"
please? This way the fix is valid on older versions of the driver an
can be backported easily.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists