[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4b600b5455fcb48975cfc9d8214cdbbc01f2e2f.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 10:03:31 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] checkpatch: warn about uses of ENOTSUPP
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:53 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> ENOTSUPP often feels like the right error code to use, but it's
> in fact not a standard Unix error. E.g.:
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -4199,6 +4199,17 @@ sub process {
> "ENOSYS means 'invalid syscall nr' and nothing else\n" . $herecurr);
> }
>
> +# ENOTSUPP is not a standard error code and should be avoided in new patches.
> +# Folks usually mean EOPNOTSUPP (also called ENOTSUP), when they type ENOTSUPP.
> +# Similarly to ENOSYS warning a small number of false positives is expected.
> + if (~$file && $line =~ /\bENOTSUPP\b/) {
It's probably my typo or my brain thinking "not" and hitting
the tilde and not the bang, but this should be
if (!$file & ...)
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> + if (WARN("ENOTSUPP",
> + "ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP\n" . $herecurr) &&
> + $fix) {
> + $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\bENOTSUPP\b/EOPNOTSUPP/;
> + }
> + }
> +
> # function brace can't be on same line, except for #defines of do while,
> # or if closed on same line
> if ($perl_version_ok &&
Powered by blists - more mailing lists