[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200512203430.mohmki5nrmayzppr@mobilestation>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 23:34:30 +0300
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Maxim Kaurkin <Maxim.Kaurkin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Ekaterina Skachko <Ekaterina.Skachko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Vadim Vlasov <V.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Alexey Kolotnikov <Alexey.Kolotnikov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] spi: dw: Add generic DW DMA controller support
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:16:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 06:36:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 04:29:25PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > Baikal-T1 SoC provides DW DMA controller to perform low-speed peripherals
> > > Mem-to-Dev and Dev-to-Mem transaction. This is also applicable to the DW
> > > APB SSI devices embedded into the SoC. Currently this type DMA device is
> >
> > This basically all looks good to me (without any hardware specific
> > knowledge), I had a few comments but they were mostly procedural ones -
> > mainly getting these bug fixes you've done merged as such. Nice work.
>
> Agree that is nice work!
> Though, can you please give us chance to review next version of the series and test on our hardware?
>
> Serge, I think you should base it on spi/for-next rather than vanilla.
Yeah, seeing there are potentially merge-conflict changes in the for-next
branch I have to do the rebase. Will be done in v2.
-Sergey
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists