[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfUzx6F8QinUZf6P76ne_uG1mVitMaMZc2WREMspOAyZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 23:35:08 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] dt-bindings: spi: Convert DW SPI binding to DT schema
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:29 PM Serge Semin
<Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru> wrote:
>
> +Cc: Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>
>
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:39:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 04:29:26PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > Modern device tree bindings are supposed to be created as YAML-files
> > > in accordance with dt-schema. This commit replaces two DW SPI legacy
> > > bare text bindings with YAML file. As before the bindings file states
> > > that the corresponding dts node is supposed to be compatible either
> > > with generic DW APB SSI controller or with Microsemi/Amazon/Renesas
> > > vendors-specific controllers, to have registers, interrupts and clocks
> > > properties. Though in case of Microsemi version of the controller
> > > there must be two registers resources specified. Properties like
> > > clock-names, reg-io-width, cs-gpio, num-cs and SPI-specific sub-nodes
> > > are optional.
> >
> > Can you incorporate work done here or agree with Wan how to proceed?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20200505191910.GA2970@bogus/T/#md626b5f6f2294b0ebd70995d5ed0e67a360e000b
>
> Don't worry. I'll make sure the updates provided by Wan including the new IP
> support are preserved after rebasing this series on top of the spi/for-next.
Thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists