linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Misc. rproc fixes around fixed memory region support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200512231022.GC16107@builder.lan>
Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 16:10:22 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Misc. rproc fixes around fixed memory region
 support

On Fri 08 May 08:14 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:

> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> On 5/2/20 1:29 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn,
> > 
> > On 4/20/20 11:05 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> > > Hi Bjorn,
> > > 
> > > This is another minor revision of the fixes around fixed memory region
> > > support [1] series. Patch 1 is revised to go back to the logic used in v1
> > > after a long discussion on the v2 version [2]. The other suggestions can
> > > be future improvments as they would require corresponding platform driver
> > > changes. Please look through the discussion there and let us know your
> > > preference. Patches are based on v5.7-rc1.
> > > 
> > > I really appreciate it if you can target the series for the current
> > > 5.7 -rc's.
> > > The fixes would apply for all 5.1+ kernels.
> > 
> > Ping on these.
> 
> The patches have been reviewed and/or acked by both Mathieu and Arnaud.

Thanks for the reviews!

> Can you please get these into the current -rc's?
> 

The offending patch appeared in 5.1, so I have a hard time claiming that
this is a regression in 5.7-rc. I've added Cc: stable and picked the two
patches for 5.8.

Thanks,
Bjorn

> Thanks,
> Suman
> 
> > 
> > regards
> > Suman
> > 
> > > 
> > > Please see the v1 cover-letter [1] for the details on the issues.
> > > 
> > > regards
> > > Suman
> > > 
> > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11422723/
> > > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/23274389/
> > > 
> > > Suman Anna (1):
> > >    remoteproc: Fix and restore the parenting hierarchy for vdev
> > > 
> > > Tero Kristo (1):
> > >    remoteproc: Fall back to using parent memory pool if no dedicated
> > >      available
> > > 
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c   |  2 +-
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > >   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > 
>