linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Misc. rproc fixes around fixed memory region support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 12:50:16 +0300
From:   Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
CC:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Misc. rproc fixes around fixed memory region
 support

On 13/05/2020 02:10, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 08 May 08:14 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> 
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> On 5/2/20 1:29 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>> Hi Bjorn,
>>>
>>> On 4/20/20 11:05 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>> Hi Bjorn,
>>>>
>>>> This is another minor revision of the fixes around fixed memory region
>>>> support [1] series. Patch 1 is revised to go back to the logic used in v1
>>>> after a long discussion on the v2 version [2]. The other suggestions can
>>>> be future improvments as they would require corresponding platform driver
>>>> changes. Please look through the discussion there and let us know your
>>>> preference. Patches are based on v5.7-rc1.
>>>>
>>>> I really appreciate it if you can target the series for the current
>>>> 5.7 -rc's.
>>>> The fixes would apply for all 5.1+ kernels.
>>>
>>> Ping on these.
>>
>> The patches have been reviewed and/or acked by both Mathieu and Arnaud.
> 
> Thanks for the reviews!
> 
>> Can you please get these into the current -rc's?
>>
> 
> The offending patch appeared in 5.1, so I have a hard time claiming that
> this is a regression in 5.7-rc. I've added Cc: stable and picked the two
> patches for 5.8.

Thanks Bjorn,

I believe 5.8 should be fine, we can backport this internally if needed.

-Tero

> 
> Thanks,
> Bjorn
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Suman
>>
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Suman
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please see the v1 cover-letter [1] for the details on the issues.
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>> Suman
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11422723/
>>>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/23274389/
>>>>
>>>> Suman Anna (1):
>>>>     remoteproc: Fix and restore the parenting hierarchy for vdev
>>>>
>>>> Tero Kristo (1):
>>>>     remoteproc: Fall back to using parent memory pool if no dedicated
>>>>       available
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c   |  2 +-
>>>>    drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>    2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>

--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki