| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:45:08 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 16/17] drm/amdgpu: gpu recovery does full modesets
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:29 PM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:17 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:12 PM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 8:58 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:54:45AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:00 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it's time to stop this little exercise.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The lockdep splat, for the record:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ 132.583381] ======================================================
> > > > > > [ 132.584091] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> > > > > > [ 132.584775] 5.7.0-rc3+ #346 Tainted: G W
> > > > > > [ 132.585461] ------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > [ 132.586184] kworker/2:3/865 is trying to acquire lock:
> > > > > > [ 132.586857] ffffc90000677c70 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > > > [ 132.587569]
> > > > > > but task is already holding lock:
> > > > > > [ 132.589044] ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched]
> > > > > > [ 132.589803]
> > > > > > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ 132.592009]
> > > > > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> > > > > > [ 132.593507]
> > > > > > -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}:
> > > > > > [ 132.595019] dma_fence_begin_signalling+0x50/0x60
> > > > > > [ 132.595767] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0xa1/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > > > [ 132.596567] drm_client_modeset_commit_atomic+0x1ea/0x250 [drm]
> > > > > > [ 132.597420] drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x55/0x190 [drm]
> > > > > > [ 132.598178] drm_client_modeset_commit+0x24/0x40 [drm]
> > > > > > [ 132.598948] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x4b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > > > [ 132.599738] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x30/0x40 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > > > [ 132.600539] fbcon_init+0x2e8/0x660
> > > > > > [ 132.601344] visual_init+0xce/0x130
> > > > > > [ 132.602156] do_bind_con_driver+0x1bc/0x2b0
> > > > > > [ 132.602970] do_take_over_console+0x115/0x180
> > > > > > [ 132.603763] do_fbcon_takeover+0x58/0xb0
> > > > > > [ 132.604564] register_framebuffer+0x1ee/0x300
> > > > > > [ 132.605369] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36e/0x520 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > > > [ 132.606187] amdgpu_fbdev_init+0xb3/0xf0 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.607032] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xe90/0x1677 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.607862] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.608697] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.609511] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80
> > > > > > [ 132.610324] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0
> > > > > > [ 132.611130] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0
> > > > > > [ 132.611939] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100
> > > > > > [ 132.612766] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60
> > > > > > [ 132.613593] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150
> > > > > > [ 132.614419] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0
> > > > > > [ 132.615249] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0
> > > > > > [ 132.616071] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0
> > > > > > [ 132.616902] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0
> > > > > > [ 132.617731] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230
> > > > > > [ 132.618560] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0
> > > > > > [ 132.619391] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110
> > > > > > [ 132.620228] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250
> > > > > > [ 132.621064] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3
> > > > > > [ 132.621903]
> > > > > > -> #1 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> > > > > > [ 132.623587] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xcc/0x10c0
> > > > > > [ 132.624448] ww_mutex_lock+0x43/0xb0
> > > > > > [ 132.625315] drm_modeset_lock+0x44/0x120 [drm]
> > > > > > [ 132.626184] drmm_mode_config_init+0x2db/0x8b0 [drm]
> > > > > > [ 132.627098] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xbd1/0x1677 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.628007] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.628920] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.629804] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80
> > > > > > [ 132.630690] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0
> > > > > > [ 132.631583] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0
> > > > > > [ 132.632479] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100
> > > > > > [ 132.633379] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60
> > > > > > [ 132.634275] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150
> > > > > > [ 132.635170] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0
> > > > > > [ 132.636069] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0
> > > > > > [ 132.636974] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0
> > > > > > [ 132.637870] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0
> > > > > > [ 132.638765] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230
> > > > > > [ 132.639654] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0
> > > > > > [ 132.640522] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110
> > > > > > [ 132.641372] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250
> > > > > > [ 132.642203] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3
> > > > > > [ 132.643022]
> > > > > > -> #0 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}:
> > > > > > [ 132.644643] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0
> > > > > > [ 132.645469] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370
> > > > > > [ 132.646274] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm]
> > > > > > [ 132.647071] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > > > [ 132.647902] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.648698] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.649498] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.650300] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.651084] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.651825] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched]
> > > > > > [ 132.652594] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580
> > > > > > [ 132.653402] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
> > > > > > [ 132.654139] kthread+0x12e/0x150
> > > > > > [ 132.654868] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
> > > > > > [ 132.655598]
> > > > > > other info that might help us debug this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ 132.657739] Chain exists of:
> > > > > > crtc_ww_class_acquire --> crtc_ww_class_mutex --> dma_fence_map
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ 132.659877] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ 132.661416] CPU0 CPU1
> > > > > > [ 132.662126] ---- ----
> > > > > > [ 132.662847] lock(dma_fence_map);
> > > > > > [ 132.663574] lock(crtc_ww_class_mutex);
> > > > > > [ 132.664319] lock(dma_fence_map);
> > > > > > [ 132.665063] lock(crtc_ww_class_acquire);
> > > > > > [ 132.665799]
> > > > > > *** DEADLOCK ***
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ 132.667965] 4 locks held by kworker/2:3/865:
> > > > > > [ 132.668701] #0: ffff8887fb81c938 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580
> > > > > > [ 132.669462] #1: ffffc90000677e58 ((work_completion)(&(&sched->work_tdr)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580
> > > > > > [ 132.670242] #2: ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched]
> > > > > > [ 132.671039] #3: ffff8887b84a1748 (&adev->lock_reset){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x59e/0xe64 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.671902]
> > > > > > stack backtrace:
> > > > > > [ 132.673515] CPU: 2 PID: 865 Comm: kworker/2:3 Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc3+ #346
> > > > > > [ 132.674347] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 4011 04/19/2018
> > > > > > [ 132.675194] Workqueue: events drm_sched_job_timedout [gpu_sched]
> > > > > > [ 132.676046] Call Trace:
> > > > > > [ 132.676897] dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0
> > > > > > [ 132.677748] check_noncircular+0x162/0x180
> > > > > > [ 132.678604] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70
> > > > > > [ 132.679459] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0
> > > > > > [ 132.680311] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370
> > > > > > [ 132.681163] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > > > [ 132.682021] ? cpumask_next+0x16/0x20
> > > > > > [ 132.682880] ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x14/0x40
> > > > > > [ 132.683737] ? __module_address+0x28/0xf0
> > > > > > [ 132.684601] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm]
> > > > > > [ 132.685466] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > > > [ 132.686335] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > > > [ 132.687255] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.688152] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.689057] ? amdgpu_fence_process+0x4c/0x150 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.689963] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.690893] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.691818] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu]
> > > > > > [ 132.692707] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched]
> > > > > > [ 132.693597] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580
> > > > > > [ 132.694487] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
> > > > > > [ 132.695373] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580
> > > > > > [ 132.696264] kthread+0x12e/0x150
> > > > > > [ 132.697154] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
> > > > > > [ 132.698057] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > > Cc: linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
> > > > > > Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > > Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > > > > > Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > > > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> > > > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > > > > > index 3584e29323c0..b3b84a0d3baf 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > > > > > @@ -2415,6 +2415,14 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> > > > > > /* displays are handled separately */
> > > > > > if (adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_DCE) {
> > > > > > /* XXX handle errors */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * This is dm_suspend, which calls modeset locks, and
> > > > > > + * that a pretty good inversion against dma_fence_signal
> > > > > > + * which gpu recovery is supposed to guarantee.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Dont ask me how to fix this.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > >
> > > > > We actually have a fix for this. Will be out shortly.
> > > >
> > > > Spoilers? Solid way is to sidesteck the entire thing by avoiding to reset
> > > > the display block entirely. Fixing the locking while still resetting the
> > > > display is going to be really hard otoh ...
> > >
> > > There's no way to avoid that. On dGPUs at least a full asic reset is
> > > a full asic reset. Mostly just skips the modeset and does the minimum
> > > amount necessary to get the display block into a good state for reset.
> >
> > But how do you restore the display afterwards? "[RFC 13/17]
> > drm/scheduler: use dma-fence annotations in tdr work" earlier in the
> > series has some ideas from me for at least
> > some of the problems for tdr when the display gets reset along.
> > Whacking the display while a modeset/flip/whatever is ongoing
> > concurrently doesn't sound like a good idea, so not sure how you can
> > do that without taking the drm_modeset_locks. And once you do that,
> > it's deadlock time.
>
> We cache the current display hw state and restore it after the reset
> without going through the atomic interfaces so everything is back the
> way it was before the reset.
Hm this sounds interesting ... how do you make sure a concurrent
atomic update doesn't trample over the same mmio registers while you
do that dance?
> IIRC, when we reset the reset of the
> GPU, we disconnect the fences, and then re-attach them after a reset.
Where is that code? Since I'm not sure how you can make that work
without getting stuck in another kind of deadlock in tdr. But maybe
the code has some clever trick to pull that off somehow.
-Daniel
>
> Alex
>
> > -Daniel
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists