[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b50b4568-88d6-3475-f3c5-84331d66632e@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:04:48 +0300
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: <fabrice.gasnier@...com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
<alexandre.torgue@...com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: stm32-timers: Use dma_request_chan() instead
dma_request_slave_channel()
On 16/04/2020 11.46, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jan 2020, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>> dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
>> eating up the error code.
>>
>> By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred
>> probing against DMA.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Fall back to PIO mode only in case of ENODEV and report all other errors
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
>> drivers/mfd/stm32-timers.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Apologies for not spotting this patch sooner, it had slipped through
> the net. If this happens again, please just submit a [RESEND].
No issues, I have also forgot about it ;)
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stm32-timers.c b/drivers/mfd/stm32-timers.c
>> index efcd4b980c94..add603359124 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/stm32-timers.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/stm32-timers.c
>> @@ -167,10 +167,11 @@ static void stm32_timers_get_arr_size(struct stm32_timers *ddata)
>> regmap_write(ddata->regmap, TIM_ARR, 0x0);
>> }
>>
>> -static void stm32_timers_dma_probe(struct device *dev,
>> +static int stm32_timers_dma_probe(struct device *dev,
>> struct stm32_timers *ddata)
>> {
>> int i;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> char name[4];
>>
>> init_completion(&ddata->dma.completion);
>> @@ -179,14 +180,23 @@ static void stm32_timers_dma_probe(struct device *dev,
>> /* Optional DMA support: get valid DMA channel(s) or NULL */
>> for (i = STM32_TIMERS_DMA_CH1; i <= STM32_TIMERS_DMA_CH4; i++) {
>> snprintf(name, ARRAY_SIZE(name), "ch%1d", i + 1);
>> - ddata->dma.chans[i] = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, name);
>> + ddata->dma.chans[i] = dma_request_chan(dev, name);
>> }
>> - ddata->dma.chans[STM32_TIMERS_DMA_UP] =
>> - dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "up");
>> - ddata->dma.chans[STM32_TIMERS_DMA_TRIG] =
>> - dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "trig");
>> - ddata->dma.chans[STM32_TIMERS_DMA_COM] =
>> - dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "com");
>> + ddata->dma.chans[STM32_TIMERS_DMA_UP] = dma_request_chan(dev, "up");
>> + ddata->dma.chans[STM32_TIMERS_DMA_TRIG] = dma_request_chan(dev, "trig");
>> + ddata->dma.chans[STM32_TIMERS_DMA_COM] = dma_request_chan(dev, "com");
>> +
>> + for (i = STM32_TIMERS_DMA_CH1; i < STM32_TIMERS_MAX_DMAS; i++) {
>> + if (IS_ERR(ddata->dma.chans[i])) {
>> + /* Save the first error code to return */
>> + if (PTR_ERR(ddata->dma.chans[i]) != -ENODEV && !ret)
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(ddata->dma.chans[i]);
>> +
>> + ddata->dma.chans[i] = NULL;
>> + }
>> + }
>
> In my mind, it doesn't make sense to keep requesting channels if an
> error has occurred. Please remove all of the added complexity caused
> by the for() loop and simply check the return value after each call to
> dma_request_chan(), returning immediately on error.
Yes. I have intentionally done the patch this way to _not_ change the
behavior in any ways as it is not up to me to decide what is good or bad
for a driver I can not test.
>
>> + return ret;
>> }
>
- Péter
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Download attachment "pEpkey.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (1754 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists