[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520084953.GC271301@dell>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 09:49:53 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: fabrice.gasnier@...com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...com, vkoul@...nel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: stm32-timers: Use dma_request_chan() instead
dma_request_slave_channel()
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
> eating up the error code.
>
> By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred
> probing against DMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Fall back to PIO mode only in case of ENODEV and report all other errors
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> drivers/mfd/stm32-timers.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists