[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878shx5d4x.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:30:54 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 5 07/31] x86/entry: Provide idtentry_entry/exit_cond_rcu()
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com> writes:
> On 5/5/20 3:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> The pagefault handler cannot use the regular idtentry_enter() because on
>> that invokes rcu_irq_enter() the pagefault was caused in the kernel.
>
> I am struggling to understand this part of the sentence: "because on
> that invokes rcu_irq_enter() the pagefault was caused in the kernel."
>
> Do you mean: "because that invokes rcu_irq_enter() if the pagefault was
> caused in the kernel." ?
Yeah. Wordsalad ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists