linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] loop: Add LOOP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB0TPYHBJTykz-x1nHPYK+ELzOhFu-7RgvKbdorqfbqmGcFqgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 15:49:00 +0200
From:   Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Narayan Kamath <narayan@...gle.com>,
        Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] loop: Add LOOP_CONFIGURE ioctl

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:22 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:07:43AM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:30 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> > > > Looks acceptable to me, but I'm getting a failure applying it to
> > > > for-5.8/drivers on this patch:
> > > >
> > > > Applying: loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation
> > > >
> > > > So you'll probably want to respin on the right branch.
> >
> > This series depends on a separate bugfix I sent to LKML earlier - see
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/31/755 . I mentioned it in [00/10] of
> > this series, but perhaps I should have just included that patch.
> >
> > I just verified that patch + this series still applies cleanly on your
> > for-5.8/drivers tree, but if you prefer I send a v5 with that patch
> > going first let me know.
>
> You probably want to resend with the fix includes as the first patch.
> And drop the truncation check now that we figured out that we don't
> actually need it.

Just sent v5, thanks!

Martijn