[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200513213007.GP4897@embeddedor>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:30:07 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 02:03:56PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:59 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavoars@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:06:07AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 07:04:04PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 05:20:08PM -0300, Arnaldo Melo wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, applied
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, Arnaldo.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if could also take the other two:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200511200911.GA13149@embeddedor/
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200511201227.GA14041@embeddedor/
> > >
> > > I think I have those, but let me make sure.
> >
> > Great. :)
>
>
> Thanks for the cleanup! It has yielded a clang compiler warning/error
> for me in kernel/git/acme/linux.git branch perf/core:
>
> util/intel-pt.c:1802:24: error: field 'br_stack' with variable sized
> type 'struct branch_stack' not
> at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension
> [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
> struct branch_stack br_stack;
>
> I think this can be resolved by reordering the members of the struct,
> and may have been a latent bug exposed by this change. It's
> unfortunate it has broken this build.
>
Yep. The following should resolve the issue:
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
index f17b1e769ae4..b34179e3926f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
@@ -1799,8 +1799,8 @@ static int intel_pt_synth_pebs_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq)
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
struct {
- struct branch_stack br_stack;
struct branch_entry entries[LBRS_MAX];
+ struct branch_stack br_stack;
} br;
if (items->mask[INTEL_PT_LBR_0_POS] ||
I'll send a proper patch.
Thanks for the report!
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists