lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158948627064.215346.9493279707055125868@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 May 2020 12:57:50 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] clk: Move HAVE_CLK config out of architecture layer

Quoting Stephen Boyd (2020-04-08 23:44:16)
> The implementation of 'struct clk' is not really an architectual detail
> anymore now that most architectures have migrated to the common clk
> framework. To sway new architecture ports away from trying to implement
> their own 'struct clk', move the config next to the common clk framework
> config.
> 
> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ