[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158948631725.215346.11486245758636089798@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 12:58:37 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>, mturquette@...libre.com,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: dra7: remove two unused symbols
Quoting Tony Lindgren (2020-04-17 08:33:42)
> Tero,
>
> * Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com> [200417 07:09]:
> > Fix the following gcc warning:
> >
> > drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c:320:43: warning: \u2018dra7_gpu_sys_clk_data\u2019
> > defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> > static const struct omap_clkctrl_div_data dra7_gpu_sys_clk_data
> > __initconst = {
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c:315:27: warning: \u2018dra7_gpu_sys_clk_parents\u2019
> > defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> > static const char * const dra7_gpu_sys_clk_parents[] __initconst = {
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Looks like this started happening with commit 957ad44ff5f2
> ("clk: ti: add clkctrl data dra7 sgx") as I did it based on
> omap5. But the clocks seem slightly different, care to check
> sgx clocking against the TRM in case I also messed up something
> else?
Is that an ack?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists