linux-kernel - Re: [V3 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: max98390: Added Amplifier Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200514101631.GB5127@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 14 May 2020 11:16:31 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>
Cc:     Steve Lee <steves.lee.maxim@...il.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org, rf@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
        Shuming [范書銘] <shumingf@...ltek.com>,
        Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, dmurphy@...com,
        jack.yu@...ltek.com, nuno.sa@...log.com,
        steves.lee@...imintegrated.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ALSA development <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        ryan.lee.maxim@...il.com, ryans.lee@...imintegrated.com
Subject: Re: [V3 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: max98390: Added Amplifier Driver

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:31:52PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:47 PM Steve Lee <steves.lee.maxim@...il.com> wrote:
> > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98390.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,1030 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +/*
> > + * max98390.c  --  MAX98390 ALSA Soc Audio driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Maxim Integrated Products
> > + *
> > + */

> My previous comments on Gerrit may confuse you.  Please use C++ style
> comments (i.e. // for all lines) here as the maintainer asked.

> Mark, may I ask why we need to do so?  Is it also applicable to header files?

It's to make things look neater - having the two comments immediately
next to each other doesn't look intentional.  Header files require a 
/* */ comment for the SPDX stuff so should do that.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)