[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514141523.GW14092@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 19:45:23 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] hwspinlock: qcom: Allow mmio usage in addition to
syscon
On 12-05-20, 17:54, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> In all modern Qualcomm platforms the mutex region of the TCSR is forked
> off into its own block, all with a offset of 0 and stride of 4096. So
> add support for directly memory mapping this register space, to avoid
> the need to represent this block using a syscon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> index f0da544b14d2..d8d4d729816c 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -70,41 +70,81 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_hwspinlock_of_match);
>
> -static int qcom_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + u32 *base, u32 *stride)
> {
> - struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
> struct device_node *syscon;
> - struct reg_field field;
> struct regmap *regmap;
> - size_t array_size;
> - u32 stride;
> - u32 base;
> int ret;
> - int i;
>
> syscon = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "syscon", 0);
> - if (!syscon) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no syscon property\n");
any reason to drop the log?
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> + if (!syscon)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(syscon);
> of_node_put(syscon);
> if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> - return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> + return regmap;
>
> - ret = of_property_read_u32_index(pdev->dev.of_node, "syscon", 1, &base);
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(pdev->dev.of_node, "syscon", 1, base);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no offset in syscon\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> - ret = of_property_read_u32_index(pdev->dev.of_node, "syscon", 2, &stride);
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(pdev->dev.of_node, "syscon", 2, stride);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no stride syscon\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> + return regmap;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 32,
> + .reg_stride = 4,
> + .val_bits = 32,
> + .max_register = 0x40000,
> + .fast_io = true,
> +};
> +
> +static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + u32 *offset, u32 *stride)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct resource *res;
> + void __iomem *base;
> +
> + /* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> + *offset = 0;
> + *stride = 0x1000;
Wouldn't it make sense to read this from DT rather than code in kernel?
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists