[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514141616.GC9266@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 16:16:16 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 1 29/36] x86/mce: Send #MC singal from task work
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:02:09AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> IOW, if we want to recover from CPL0 #MC, we will need a different mechanism.
Recovering from CPL0 #MC is mostly doomed to failure. Except this mcsafe
crap with the exception handling:
/*
* Handle an MCE which has happened in kernel space but from
* which the kernel can recover: ex_has_fault_handler() has
* already verified that the rIP at which the error happened is
* a rIP from which the kernel can recover (by jumping to
* recovery code specified in _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT()) and the
* corresponding exception handler which would do that is the
* proper one.
*/
if (m.kflags & MCE_IN_KERNEL_RECOV) {
if (!fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_MC, error_code, 0))
mce_panic("Failed kernel mode recovery", &m, msg);
Other than that, we iz done.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists