linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] thermal: cpuidle: Register cpuidle cooling device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200515095751.GA25267@bogus>
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 10:58:02 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "open list:CPU IDLE TIME MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:CPUIDLE DRIVER - ARM PSCI" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] thermal: cpuidle: Register cpuidle cooling device

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 08:00:01PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 29/04/2020 23:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 29/04/2020 22:02, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/29/20 11:36 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>> The cpuidle driver can be used as a cooling device by injecting idle
> >>> cycles. The DT binding for the idle state added an optional
> >>>
> >>> When the property is set, register the cpuidle driver with the idle
> >>> state node pointer as a cooling device. The thermal framework will do
> >>> the association automatically with the thermal zone via the
> >>> cooling-device defined in the device tree cooling-maps section.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>   - V4:
> >>>     - Do not check the return value as the function does no longer
> >>> return one
> >>> ---
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> >> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
> >
> > Thanks Lukasz for the review.
> >
> > Rafael, as Lorenzo and Sudeep are not responsive, could you consider ack
> > this patch so I can merge the series through the thermal tree ?
>
> Gentle ping ... Sudeep, Lorenzo or Rafael ?
>

Sorry for the delay. I ignore this as it was generic and I was fine with
it. Didn't know you were waiting me, sorry for that.

FWIW:

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep