linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] thermal: cpuidle: Register cpuidle cooling device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6faac4ac-b711-11ad-32e7-26ae930db6fa@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 13:03:07 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "open list:CPU IDLE TIME MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:CPUIDLE DRIVER - ARM PSCI" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] thermal: cpuidle: Register cpuidle cooling device

On 15/05/2020 11:58, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 08:00:01PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 29/04/2020 23:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 29/04/2020 22:02, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/29/20 11:36 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>> The cpuidle driver can be used as a cooling device by injecting idle
>>>>> cycles. The DT binding for the idle state added an optional
>>>>>
>>>>> When the property is set, register the cpuidle driver with the idle
>>>>> state node pointer as a cooling device. The thermal framework will do
>>>>> the association automatically with the thermal zone via the
>>>>> cooling-device defined in the device tree cooling-maps section.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   - V4:
>>>>>     - Do not check the return value as the function does no longer
>>>>> return one
>>>>> ---
>>>
>>> [ ... ]
>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
>>>
>>> Thanks Lukasz for the review.
>>>
>>> Rafael, as Lorenzo and Sudeep are not responsive, could you consider ack
>>> this patch so I can merge the series through the thermal tree ?
>>
>> Gentle ping ... Sudeep, Lorenzo or Rafael ?
>>
> 
> Sorry for the delay. I ignore this as it was generic and I was fine with
> it. Didn't know you were waiting me, sorry for that.

No problem, thanks for the ack.

> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

Rafael, if you are ok with that, I'll take this patch in the thermal
tree along with the others.


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog