linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdUWaEAuStEQZD4yOWcxBT0EkxiX90u1_9vppFb5JniGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 17:27:19 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     "Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        masonccyang@...c.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel
 LGM SoC

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:25 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:48 PM kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:

> >    440                  reg = cpu_to_be32(*pdata++);
> >  > 441                  writel(reg, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CMSG_0);
> >    442
> >    443                  reg = cpu_to_be32(*pdata);
> >    444                  writel(reg, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CMSG_1);
>
> On BE:
> cpu_to_be32 -> no-op
> writel() -> converts reg to LE
>
> On LE:
> cpu_to_be32 -> converts to BE
> writel() -> no-op (in terms of conversion)
>
> Seems to me that the proper API (if above is intended) should be swab32().
> But something tells me that above is broken (or my understanding is wrong).

And perhaps it should use lo_hi_writeq() or something like that.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko