[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518223536.GJ2165@builder.lan>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 15:35:36 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Support ETMv4 power
management
On Mon 18 May 12:08 PDT 2020, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 2020-05-19 00:21, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri 15 May 03:55 PDT 2020, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > >
> > > The previous version of this patch in QCOM tree seems to have added
> > > the
> > > property to replicator node instead of etm7 node, can you please drop
> > > that from the tree and apply this one?
> > >
> >
> > I'm not able to replace the old commit without rewriting the history of
> > the branch. So I've applied a patch ontop of the branch to fix this up
> > instead.
> >
> > Please review the branch and let me know if there's any issues.
> >
>
> Thanks for the patch, I checked the branch and its good.
> Sorry, I should have sent a patch on top of the old one
> instead of repost.
>
No worries, now you know for next time. Thanks confirming my fix.
Thanks,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists