[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200519110104.GH279861@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:01:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, ak@...ux.intel.com,
wei.w.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Emulate LBR feature via guest
LBR event
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:30:51PM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
> + struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> + .type = PERF_TYPE_RAW,
> + .size = sizeof(attr),
> + .pinned = true,
> + .exclude_host = true,
> + .config = INTEL_FIXED_VLBR_EVENT,
> + .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK,
> + .branch_sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL_STACK |
> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER,
Maybe order the fields according to how they're declared in the
structure?
> + };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists