[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200519110355.GI279861@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:03:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, ak@...ux.intel.com,
wei.w.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Emulate LBR feature via guest
LBR event
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:30:51PM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
> @@ -6698,6 +6698,7 @@ static fastpath_t vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> if (vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu)->version)
> atomic_switch_perf_msrs(vmx);
> +
> atomic_switch_umwait_control_msr(vmx);
>
> if (enable_preemption_timer)
Is this where the test to see if any of the KVM events went into ERROR
state should go?
if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR) {
pr_warn("unhappy, someone stole our counter\n");
}
like..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists