[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c170c353-9fe1-a849-d062-74e42f22661c@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 15:37:08 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/99] 3.16.84-rc1 review
On 5/21/20 1:20 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-05-20 at 14:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 5/20/20 7:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.84 release.
>>> There are 99 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri May 22 20:00:00 UTC 2020.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>> Build results:
>> total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0
>> Qemu test results:
>> total: 230 pass: 227 fail: 3
>> Failed tests:
>> arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:initrd
>> arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:usb:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
>> arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:sata:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
>>
>> The arm tests fail due to a compile error.
>>
>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-periph.c:524:65: error: 'CLK_IS_CRITICAL' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'CLK_IS_BASIC'?
>
> I already looked at your first test results and dropped the patch that
> uses CLK_IS_CRITICAL, so there's something else going wrong there...
>
Ah yes. Sorry, I didn't notice that there was a rebuild.
Images are fine; the three failing tests should not have been
tested in the first place (they never did, but I didn't update
the blacklist when I increased the qemu memory size to 512MB).
Guenter
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists