linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/99] 3.16.84-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7eea57f1bab1b9f321e1c52d9bfc6103b9a45a5.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 01:00:24 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/99] 3.16.84-rc1 review

On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 15:37 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/21/20 1:20 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-05-20 at 14:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 5/20/20 7:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.84 release.
> > > > There are 99 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Fri May 22 20:00:00 UTC 2020.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > Build results:
> > > 	total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > 	total: 230 pass: 227 fail: 3
> > > Failed tests:
> > > 	arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:initrd
> > > 	arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:usb:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
> > > 	arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:sata:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
> > > 
> > > The arm tests fail due to a compile error.
> > > 
> > > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-periph.c:524:65: error: 'CLK_IS_CRITICAL' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'CLK_IS_BASIC'?
> > 
> > I already looked at your first test results and dropped the patch that
> > uses CLK_IS_CRITICAL, so there's something else going wrong there...
> > 
> 
> Ah yes. Sorry, I didn't notice that there was a rebuild.
> 
> Images are fine; the three failing tests should not have been
> tested in the first place (they never did, but I didn't update
> the blacklist when I increased the qemu memory size to 512MB).

OK, thanks for checking.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Logic doesn't apply to the real world. - Marvin Minsky



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)