[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v65AGb+4=+vRn2OdBx=fYXmZLFqASsyh-xh=ruCgbg92ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 10:47:33 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/99] 3.16.84-rc1 review
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:23 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On 5/20/20 7:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.84 release.
> > There are 99 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri May 22 20:00:00 UTC 2020.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> Build results:
> total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 230 pass: 227 fail: 3
> Failed tests:
> arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:initrd
> arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:usb:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
> arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:sata:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
>
> The arm tests fail due to a compile error.
>
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-periph.c:524:65: error: 'CLK_IS_CRITICAL' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'CLK_IS_BASIC'?
This looks like a result of having
clk: tegra: Mark fuse clock as critical
[bf83b96f87ae2abb1e535306ea53608e8de5dfbb]
In which case you probably need to add
32b9b1096186 clk: Allow clocks to be marked as CRITICAL
to the pile.
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists