linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/99] 3.16.84-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <96227771-f6bd-9508-5a68-ab35df370dc1@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 00:40:41 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/99] 3.16.84-rc1 review

On 5/20/20 7:47 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:23 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/20/20 7:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.84 release.
>>> There are 99 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri May 22 20:00:00 UTC 2020.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>> Build results:
>>         total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0
>> Qemu test results:
>>         total: 230 pass: 227 fail: 3
>> Failed tests:
>>         arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:initrd
>>         arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:usb:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
>>         arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:sata:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
>>
>> The arm tests fail due to a compile error.
>>
>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-periph.c:524:65: error: 'CLK_IS_CRITICAL' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'CLK_IS_BASIC'?
> 
> This looks like a result of having
> 
>       clk: tegra: Mark fuse clock as critical
>          [bf83b96f87ae2abb1e535306ea53608e8de5dfbb]
> 
> In which case you probably need to add
> 
>     32b9b1096186 clk: Allow clocks to be marked as CRITICAL
> 

Then you might also need commit ef56b79b66f ("clk: fix critical
clock locking") which fixes it.

Guenter