linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: spi: Add schema for Cadence QSPI Controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 13:20:35 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, vigneshr@...com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, qi-ming.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: spi: Add schema for Cadence QSPI
 Controller driver

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 08:14:04PM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> On 21/5/2020 6:56 pm, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That doesn't address either of the issues.  The removal of the old
> > bindings and addition of the YAML ones needs to be in a single patch
> > doing that conversion.  What I'm suggesting should be done separately is
> > whatever changes to the semantics of the bindings you are (according to
> > your changelog) doing.

> You mean semantics of the binding as a single patch you are suggesting me,
> right? , Thanks!

I mean that any changes to the bindings ought to be split out into
separate patches, if there's multiple changes it may make sense for
there to be multiple patches.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)