lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 20:34:43 +0800
From:   "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, vigneshr@...com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, qi-ming.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: spi: Add schema for Cadence QSPI
 Controller driver

Hi Mark,

On 21/5/2020 8:20 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 08:14:04PM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>> On 21/5/2020 6:56 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> That doesn't address either of the issues.  The removal of the old
>>> bindings and addition of the YAML ones needs to be in a single patch
>>> doing that conversion.  What I'm suggesting should be done separately is
>>> whatever changes to the semantics of the bindings you are (according to
>>> your changelog) doing.
> 
>> You mean semantics of the binding as a single patch you are suggesting me,
>> right? , Thanks!
> 
> I mean that any changes to the bindings ought to be split out into
> separate patches, if there's multiple changes it may make sense for
> there to be multiple patches.
Got it, we do not have multiple changes since it is new YAML file.
in case if we feel anything to be added , we add as separate patches.
Thanks!

Regards
Vadivel

> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists