[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200521163957.GG4770@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 17:39:57 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Mason Yang <masonccyang@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/19] mtd: spi-nor: add xSPI Octal DTR support
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:00:34PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series adds support for octal DTR flashes in the spi-nor framework,
> and then adds hooks for the Cypress Semper and Mircom Xcella flashes to
> allow running them in octal DTR mode. This series assumes that the flash
> is handed to the kernel in Legacy SPI mode.
Are people happy with the SPI bits of this from a MTD point of view? I
don't have any concerns and could apply them on a branch even if more
revisions are needed for the MTD side.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists