linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/19] mtd: spi-nor: add xSPI Octal DTR support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200521180511.4axjf46g6b25mp3k@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 23:35:11 +0530
From:   Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
        Mason Yang <masonccyang@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/19] mtd: spi-nor: add xSPI Octal DTR support

Hi Mark,

On 21/05/20 05:39PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:00:34PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This series adds support for octal DTR flashes in the spi-nor framework,
> > and then adds hooks for the Cypress Semper and Mircom Xcella flashes to
> > allow running them in octal DTR mode. This series assumes that the flash
> > is handed to the kernel in Legacy SPI mode.
> 
> Are people happy with the SPI bits of this from a MTD point of view?  I
> don't have any concerns and could apply them on a branch even if more
> revisions are needed for the MTD side.

There were a couple small changes suggested for spi-mem. Will send a 
re-roll in a few minutes.

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments India