[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c1c6fec-a3fa-f368-ae40-189a8f062068@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 12:48:49 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Yotam Gigi <yotam.gi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -net-next] net: psample: depends on INET
On 5/22/20 12:17 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:03 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>>
>> Fix psample build error when CONFIG_INET is not set/enabled.
>> PSAMPLE should depend on INET instead of NET since
>> ip_tunnel_info_opts() is only present for CONFIG_INET.
>>
>> ../net/psample/psample.c: In function ‘__psample_ip_tun_to_nlattr’:
>> ../net/psample/psample.c:216:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ip_tunnel_info_opts’; did you mean ‘ip_tunnel_info_opts_set’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Or just make this tunnel support optional. psample does not
> require it to function correctly.
Sure, I thought of that, but it's not clear to me which bits of it
to make optional, so I'll leave it for its maintainer to handle.
thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists