[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.2005220144230.21168@redsun52.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 02:04:06 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@...ux.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: piix4-poweroff.c I/O BAR usage
Hi Bjorn,
Paul may or may not be reachable anymore, so I'll step in.
> This looks like it might be a bug:
>
> static const int piix4_pm_io_region = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES;
>
> static int piix4_poweroff_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
> ...
> /* Request access to the PIIX4 PM IO registers */
> res = pci_request_region(dev, piix4_pm_io_region,
> "PIIX4 PM IO registers");
>
> pci_request_region() takes a BAR number (0-5), but here we're passing
> PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES (13 if CONFIG_PCI_IOV, or 7 otherwise), which is
> the bridge I/O window.
>
> I don't think this device ([8086:7113]) is a bridge, so that resource
> should be empty.
Hmm, isn't the resource actually set up by `quirk_piix4_acpi' though?
> Based on this spec:
> https://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/datasheet/290562.pdf,
> it looks like it should be the PIIX4 power management function at
> function 3, which has no standard PCI BARs but does have a PMBA (Power
> Management Base Address) at 0x40 and an SMBBA (SMBus Base Address) at
> 0x90 in config space.
Correct, this is what Malta firmware reports for this function:
Bus = 0x00, Dev = 0x0a, Function = 0x03
Vendor Id = 0x8086 (Intel), Dev ID = 0x7113 (PIIX4 Power)
Min Gnt = 0x00, Max Lat = 0x00, Lat Tim = 0x20
Int Pin = None, Int Line = 0x09
BAR count = 0x02
IO: Pos = 0x40, Base(CPU/PCI) = 0x18001000/0x00001000, Size = 0x00000100
IO: Pos = 0x90, Base(CPU/PCI) = 0x18001100/0x00001100, Size = 0x00000100
I'm somewhat familiar with this southbridge, although this was looong ago.
> I suppose on an ACPI system the regions described by PMBA and SMBBA
> might be described via ACPI, since they're not discoverable by
> standard PCI enumeration? Pretty sure you don't have ACPI on MIPS
> though.
>
> Maybe the driver should read PMBA and SMBBA and reserve those regions
> by hand with request_region()?
Well, I think `quirk_piix4_acpi' covers it. It dates back to 2.3.49
AFAICT. I can try to boot my Malta system over the weekend to see if
there are any issues with it, but I'm fairly sure there is none here.
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists