lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 02:35:23 +0100 From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> Cc: ira.weiny@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable pagefault/preempt twice On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:29:50AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 06:11:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Mainline, with: > > > > qemu-system-sparc -M SS-4 -kernel arch/sparc/boot/zImage -no-reboot \ > > -snapshot -drive file=rootfs.ext2,format=raw,if=scsi \ > > -append "panic=-1 slub_debug=FZPUA root=/dev/sda console=ttyS0" > > -nographic -monitor none > > > > The machine doesn't really matter, though. > > It does, unfortunately - try that with SS-10 and watch what happens ;-/ Ugh... It's actually something in -m handling: -m 256 passes, -m 512 leads to that panic.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists