[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f1a7c29-340d-f61b-b102-d300932dc92c@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 08:55:50 -0600
From: shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests: vdso: Add a selftest for vDSO getcpu()
On 5/19/20 11:44 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:11:28AM -0600, shuah wrote:
>> On 5/5/20 11:47 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long sysinfo_ehdr = getauxval(AT_SYSINFO_EHDR);
>>
>> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
>> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
>> #135: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_getcpu.c:27:
>> + unsigned long sysinfo_ehdr = getauxval(AT_SYSINFO_EHDR);
A blank line after declarations here just like what checkpatch
suggests. It makes it readable.
>> + if (!sysinfo_ehdr) {
>
> This is the idiom in use by the existing gettimeofday test:
>
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> #38: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/vDSO/vdso_test_gettimeofday.c:38:
> + unsigned long sysinfo_ehdr = getauxval(AT_SYSINFO_EHDR);
> + if (!sysinfo_ehdr) {
>
> so I don't know how you want the code to look here?
>
See above.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists