[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200524235732.GI2605652@cisco>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 17:57:32 -0600
From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
To: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
christian.brauner@...ntu.com, keescook@...omium.org,
cyphar@...har.com, Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
jannh@...gle.com, rsesek@...gle.com, palmer@...gle.com,
Matt Denton <mpdenton@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] seccomp: Introduce addfd ioctl to seccomp user
notifier
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 04:39:39PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> +static void seccomp_handle_addfd(struct seccomp_kaddfd *addfd)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Remove the notification, and reset the list pointers, indicating
> + * that it has been handled.
> + */
> + list_del_init(&addfd->list);
> +
> + ret = security_file_receive(addfd->file);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (addfd->fd >= 0) {
> + ret = replace_fd(addfd->fd, addfd->file, addfd->flags);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + fput(addfd->file);
> + } else {
> + ret = get_unused_fd_flags(addfd->flags);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + fd_install(ret, addfd->file);
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + addfd->ret = ret;
> + complete(&addfd->completion);
> +}
My previous comment about SCM_RIGHTS still applies, right? That is, we
should do,
sock = sock_from_file(fp[i], &err);
if (sock) {
sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
}
and perhaps lift that into a helper.
Tycho
Powered by blists - more mailing lists