[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200525134318.GB5221@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:43:18 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
jean-philippe <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
kenneth-lee-2012@...mail.com, Wangzhou <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Let pci_fixup_final access iommu_fwnode
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:08:29PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> Some platform devices appear as PCI but are
> actually on the AMBA bus, and they need fixup in
> drivers/pci/quirks.c handling iommu_fwnode.
> So calling pci_fixup_final after iommu_fwnode is allocated.
>
> For example:
> Hisilicon platform device need fixup in
> drivers/pci/quirks.c
>
> +static void quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec;
> +
> + pdev->eetlp_prefix_path = 1;
> + fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(&pdev->dev);
> + if (fwspec)
> + fwspec->can_stall = 1;
> +}
> +
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0xa250, quirk_huawei_pcie_sva);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0xa251, quirk_huawei_pcie_sva);
I don't think it is a great idea to hook this into PCI_FIXUP_FINAL. The
fixup list needs to be processed for every device, which will slow down
probing.
So either we introduce something like PCI_FIXUP_IOMMU, if this is
entirely PCI specific. If it needs to be generic we need some fixup
infrastructure in the IOMMU code itself.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists