linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Let pci_fixup_final access iommu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 20:07:01 +0800
From:   Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        jean-philippe <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        kenneth-lee-2012@...mail.com, Wangzhou <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Let pci_fixup_final access iommu_fwnode



On 2020/5/25 下午9:43, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:08:29PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>> Some platform devices appear as PCI but are
>> actually on the AMBA bus, and they need fixup in
>> drivers/pci/quirks.c handling iommu_fwnode.
>> So calling pci_fixup_final after iommu_fwnode is allocated.
>>
>> For example:
>> Hisilicon platform device need fixup in
>> drivers/pci/quirks.c
>>
>> +static void quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec;
>> +
>> +	pdev->eetlp_prefix_path = 1;
>> +	fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(&pdev->dev);
>> +	if (fwspec)
>> +		fwspec->can_stall = 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0xa250, quirk_huawei_pcie_sva);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0xa251, quirk_huawei_pcie_sva);
> I don't think it is a great idea to hook this into PCI_FIXUP_FINAL. The
> fixup list needs to be processed for every device, which will slow down
> probing.
>
> So either we introduce something like PCI_FIXUP_IOMMU, if this is
> entirely PCI specific. If it needs to be generic we need some fixup
> infrastructure in the IOMMU code itself.

Thanks Joerg for the good suggestion.
I am trying to introduce PCI_FIXUP_IOMMU in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/26/366

Thanks